Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Ors. [WP (C) No. 202/ 1995]

We appeared on behalf of the National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and assisted Senior Advocate Geeta Luthra in Interlocutory Application(s) bearing Nos. 66542, 66546 and 66548 of 2024 during final arguments wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court, was pleased to extend the stay imposed upon the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Guwahati HC, Aizawl Bench in W.P (C) 130 of 2013.

IDBI Bank Ltd. v. Power Finance Corporation Ltd. & Ors. [(2023) SCC OnLine Del 2909]

We represented Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No. 2) upon a dispute concerning invocation of Bank Guarantee(s).

Devendra Kumar v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railways and Others [(2022) SCC OnLine Del 776]

We represented the Petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi wherein he was appointed to the Ministry of Railways with specific orders to ensure all the lost consequential benefits since his rejection.

Sunil Kumar Dahiya v. State [2020 SCC OnLine Del 1591: 2021 Cri LJ (NOC 315) 97]

We represented 200 homebuyers as Complainants and procured a favourable judgment ensuring dismissal of Bail Application of the Accused Builder.

COL. P. K. Uberoi (Retd.) & Anr. v. Vigneshwara Developwell Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [(2020) ibclaw.in 69 HC; (2020) SCC OnLine Del 399; (2020) 220 Comp Cas 262]

We represented Vigneshwara Barter Investors’ Association and procured a favourable Order sanctioning the Scheme of Compromise, Settlement and Arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956.

Sunil Kumar Dahiya v. Union of India [(2019) SCC OnLine Del 11300; (2019) ibclaw.in 49 HC]

We represented Vigneshwara Barter Investors’ Association and successfully ensured stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated by National Company Law Tribunal (Principal Bench) during the pendency of the adjudication upon the Scheme of Compromise and Arrangement propounded by the Ex-Management of the Corporate Debtor under the Companies Act, 1956.

Abhinandan Kumar Jain v. MVL Limited [(2019) SCC OnLine Del 10399: (2019) 264 DLT 400: (2020) 1 BC 158: (2020) 154 CLA 431]

We represented aggrieved home buyers and assisted and briefed Senior Advocate, Shri Anil Kumar Airi during the course of Final Arguments upon the question of transfer of cases from the Hon’ble High Court to NCLT benches post enactment of the IBC, 2016.

Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Bihar [2024] 165 taxmann.com 721 (Patna)]

We represented Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured a favourable judgement wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Patna was pleased to quash the assessment order and the demand notice issued by the Commercial Tax Department, Sasaram, Bihar.

M/s Arihant Coal Sales (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation in MCRC No. 48569 of 2024 and 48573 of 2024

We appeared and procured a Stay Order against the operation and effect of the chargesheet filed against the Petitioners and the consequential proceedings initiated by the Central Bureau of Investigation before the Ld. Special Magistrate, CBI & EOW, Indore, Madhya Pradesh.

Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [CWP No. of 2024]

We represented Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured a Stay on the effect and operation of the Demand Notice issued against the Petitioner by Joint/ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurugram, Haryana.  

Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [CWP No. 18326 of 2024]

We represented Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured a Stay on the effect and operation of the Demand Notice issued against the Petitioner by Joint/ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurugram, Haryana.  

CA Rajeev Bansal, Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Soma-Indus Varanasi Aurangabad Tollway Pvt. Ltd. [(2024) SCC OnLine NCLAT 67]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd.

CA Rajeev Bansal, Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. [(2024) ibclaw.in 60 NCLAT]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd and procured a favourable judgement seeking ratification/ regularization of its action to contest a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Patna High Court. 

Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. through its Liquidator v. Shailesh Verma & Others [(2022) SCC OnLine NCLAT 425; (2022) ibclaw.in 893 NCLAT]

We represented and assisted Senior Advocate, Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate on behalf of the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Indian Railways Through the Chief Electricity Distribution Engineer v. Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited and Others [2023 SCC OnLine CERC 354]

We represented Bihar Utilities and assisted in arguments and procured a favourable judgement wherein the Petition filed by the Indian Railways under Section 79(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Clause 7.0 of the Bulk Power Purchase Agreement (BPPA) dated 16.12.2010 executed between Indian Railways and Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited seeking relief on account of Force Majeure events was rejected by the Hon’ble Commission.

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. BSP(H)CL and Others [(2022) SCC OnLine CERC 57]

We represented BSP(H)CL and procured a favourable judgement wherein substantial submissions of the undersigned were recorded by the Hon’ble Commission to reach to an able conclusion amongst several Power sector companies of various states having been called upon to submit upon the legality of the leviable charges, tariff etc.

TBEA Energy (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. [(2023) SCC OnLine NCLT 1028]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. upon the question of funds lying in escrow account to be distributed under a special mechanism surpassing the procedure enshrined in law.

Man Structurals Pvt. Ltd. v. CA Rajeev Bansal (Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd.) [(2023) ibclaw.in 94 NCLT]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured a favourable order detailing the requisites of substantiation of claim filed in the liquidation process of a Corporate Debtor.

Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Isolux Corsan India Engineering and Construction Private Limited [2022 SCC OnLine NCLT 16146]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured a favourable order towards seeking a blanket approval u/s 33(5) of the IBC, 2016 qua initiation of civil and other legal proceedings filed against and on behalf of the Corporate Debtor.

Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. [2022 SCC OnLine NCLT 16144]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. wherein the Liquidator rejected the claim of the Applicants on account of being time-barred pursuant to which an Application u/s 42 of IBC, 2016 was filed and the Liquidator was directed to reconsider the claims filed by the Applicant.

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited through Mr. Nitin Jain, Resolution Professional v. Satish Soin

[2021 SCC OnLine NCLT 30949]

We represented the Financial Creditor and procured a favourable order wherein the Hon’ble Tribunal admitted the petition filed on behalf of Edelweiss towards initiating insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016.

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited through Mr. Nitin Jain, Resolution Professional v. Abhishek Soin [2021 SCC OnLine NCLT 30948]

We represented the Financial Creditor and procured a favourable order wherein the Hon’ble Tribunal admitted the petition filed on behalf of Edelweiss towards initiating insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016.

Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited through Mr. Nitin Jain, Resolution Professional v. Dinesh Soin [2021 SCC OnLine NCLT 30950]

We represented the Financial Creditor and procured a favourable order wherein the Hon’ble Tribunal admitted the petition filed on behalf of Edelweiss towards initiating insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016.

CA Rajeev Bansal (Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd.) v. Shailesh Verma (Resolution Professional of SEUPPTCL) [(2021) SCC OnLine NCLT 356]

We represented the Liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction Pvt. Ltd. and procured Orders to expeditiously consider the claim of the Applicant in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.